Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17373089rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030637lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17373089lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521991lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17373089lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17373089lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17373089lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17373089lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2003942lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:dateCreated2007-3-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:abstractTextTypeability, reproducibility, and discriminatory power of ERIC-PCR and Apal-PFGE to establish the genetic relation of P. multocida strains were determined. Forty-nine strains of different source, biotype, capsular group, somatic serotype, and resistance to antimicrobials were studied. By ERIC-PCR, 31 patterns were defined with 10 to 14 bands in a rank of 0.2 and 1.2 kb. By Apal-PFGE, 37 restriction patterns were established with 7 to 15 bands of 34 to 450 kb. Typeability was 100% (T=1) for ERIC-PCR, and 94% (T = 0.94) for Apal-PFGE. Reproducibility of both techniques was 100% (R=1). Discriminatory power was 93% (D = 0.93) for ERIC-PCR, and 98% (D = 0.98) for Apal-PFGE. By using both techniques, epidemiologically related strains were grouped, and unrelated strains were clearly differentiated. The value of ERIC-PCR and Apal-PFGE as complements to epidemiologic studies was demonstrated, especially when both techniques were used to analyze the strains.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:languagespalld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:issn0325-7541lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RivasMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChinenIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeottaG AGAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VigoG BGBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GugliadaJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:volume38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:pagination190-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:dateRevised2008-8-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17373089...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:articleTitle[Evaluation of two techniques of molecular subtyping to study Pasteurella multocida].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:affiliationServicio Fisiopatogenia,Departamento Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas--Administracidó Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud Dr. Carlos G. Malbrin, Buenos Aires, Argentina. galeotta@anlis.gov.arlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17373089pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:17373089lld:pubmed