rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-5-7
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The present study evaluated outcomes of patients undergoing proximal diversion using either a loop ileostomy or loop colostomy following distal colorectal resection for malignant and non-malignant disease.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
0364-2313
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
31
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1142-51
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Anastomosis, Surgical,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Colon,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Colostomy,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Data Interpretation, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Decompression, Surgical,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Ileostomy,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Rectum,
pubmed-meshheading:17354030-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Review,
Meta-Analysis
|