Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17343294
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-12-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We performed a comparison study focusing on differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) between 3-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with parallel imaging. Thirty healthy volunteers underwent DTI with an eight-channel phased-array coil at both 3 T and 1.5 T. Histogram and region of interest (ROI) analyses were performed. Paired t tests were applied for statistical analysis. Signal-to-noise ratios of these regions were also measured. For histogram analysis, peak location of FA was significantly lower at 3 T than at 1.5 T (P = 0.04). Mean FA was significantly higher at 3 T than at 1.5 T (P = 0.002). Peak location of MD was significantly lower at 3 T than at 1.5 T (P < 0.001). Mean MD was significantly lower at 3 T than at 1.5 T (P < 0.001). In ROI analysis, FA was significantly larger at 3 T than at 1.5 T in the centrum semiovale (P < 0.001), middle cerebellar peduncle (P < 0.001), cerebral peduncle (P = 0.006), posterior limb of the internal capsule (P = 0.007), genu (P < 0.001) and splenium (P < 0.001). FA was significantly lower at 3 T than at 1.5 T in the globus pallidus (P < 0.001). MD was significantly smaller at 3 T than at 1.5 T in the globus pallidus (P = 0.007), thalamus (P < 0.001), centrum semiovale (P < 0.001), middle cerebellar peduncle (P < 0.001), cerebral peduncle (P = 0.01), posterior limb of the internal capsule (P < 0.001), genu (P = 0.01) and splenium (P < 0.001). Significant differences in FA and MD exist between 3 T and 1.5 T for whole-brain histogram analysis and ROI analysis.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0952-3480
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:AsoToshihikoT,
pubmed-author:FukuyamaHidenaoH,
pubmed-author:FushimiYasutakaY,
pubmed-author:KikutaKen-IchiroK,
pubmed-author:MikiYukioY,
pubmed-author:MoriNobuyukiN,
pubmed-author:OkadaTsutomuT,
pubmed-author:TogashiKaoriK,
pubmed-author:UrayamaShin-IchiS,
pubmed-author:VialeJ PJP,
pubmed-author:YamamotoAkiraA
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
20
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
743-8
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Anisotropy,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Cerebellum,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Diffusion,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17343294-Organ Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|