Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-2-27
pubmed:abstractText
A large number of genetic disease model mice have been produced by genetic engineering. However, phenotypic analysis is not sufficient, particularly for brain dysfunction in neurogenetic diseases. We tried to develop a new assessment system mainly for motor and reflex functions in G(M1)-gangliosidosis model mice. Two genetically engineered model mouse strains were used for this study: the beta-galactosidase-deficient knockout mouse representing infantile G(M1)-gangliosidosis (severe form), and transgenic mouse representing juvenile G(M1)-gangliosidosis (mild form). We modified human child neurology techniques, and selected eleven tests for motor assessment and reflex testing. The test results were scored in four grades: 0 (normal), 1 (slightly abnormal), 2 (moderately abnormal), and 3 (severely abnormal). Both disease model mouse strains showed high scores even at the apparently pre-symptomatic stage of the disease, particularly with abnormal tail and hind limb postures. Individual and total test scores were well correlated with the progression of the disease. This method is simple, quick, and reproducible. The testing is sensitive enough to detect early neurological abnormalities, and will be useful for monitoring the natural clinical course and effect of therapeutic experiments in various neurogenetic disease model mice, such as chemical chaperone therapy for G(M1)-gangliosidosis model mice.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0387-7604
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
29
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
210-6
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Motor and reflex testing in GM1-gangliosidosis model mice.
pubmed:affiliation
Graduate School, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't