Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-10-4
pubmed:abstractText
Although magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is widely used for rectal cancer staging, many centres in the UK perform computed tomography (CT) for staging rectal cancer at present. Furthermore in a small proportion of cases contraindications to MR imaging may lead to staging using CT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of current generation multidetector row CT (MDCT) in local staging of rectal cancer. In particular the accuracy of multiplanar (MPR) versus axial images in the staging of rectal cancer was assessed.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0009-9260
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
61
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
924-31
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology.
pubmed:affiliation
Departments of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. rakslide@hotmail.com <rakslide@hotmail.com>
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study