Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16987118
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-9-21
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Regular use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by health care providers in their routine practice may help to improve the quality of care, but more evidence is needed before routine use of PROMs can be recommended. A structured review was undertaken to examine whether and how regular use of PROMs might improve routine practice.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
1356-1294
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
12
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
559-68
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Patient-reported Health Instruments Group, National Centre for Health Outcomes Development, Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|