Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16971244
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-9-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Each of the seven systems described has advantages and drawbacks that consist of ease or difficulty of application, accuracy, validity, and availability. This article should contribute to make these systems better known and easier to apply, and thus, will encourage their use in clinical practice. [Fig.: see text].
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1083-7515
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
11
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
509-19
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Scoring systems for evaluating ankle function.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meir General Hospital, Sapir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovski St., Kfar-Saba, Israel. drmann@regin-med.co.il
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|