Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16922935
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-8-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Genital diseases include a wide range of lesions e.g. infectious and inflammatory. In most cases a clinical diagnosis is reached without the need for a biopsy. Nonetheless, a genital biopsy is safe and may help to confirm the diagnosis. We established a dedicated diagnostic biopsy clinic in 2003. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of our diagnostic biopsy clinic and compare it with other Genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in the UK. A retrospective case-note study was performed on 71 patients referred to the biopsy clinic with persistent genital lesions over a 12-month period. Forty-seven biopsies were performed (71% biopsy rate). 43 specimens (92%) were appropriate for histopathological diagnosis. Of these 15% were lichen planus, 15% lichen sclerosis, 10% psoriasis, 7.5% each: eczema, Zoon's and non-specific balanitis. The remainder represented a variety of other conditions. In 27 cases (68%) the clinical diagnosis was consistent with the histological result. The possibility of self-referral and walk-in nature of our GUM service substantially decrease the waiting times for assessment of anogenital disorders. We had a lower biopsy rate for the diagnosis of non-specific balanitis (7.5%) compared with the average rate (21.5%) in 14 UK GUM clinics and good agreement between clinical and histological diagnosis. An empirical first treatment, with simple emollients before biopsy, appears to be a safe clinical approach for the treatment of non-specific balanitis. A multidisciplinary approach (GUM physicians, dermatologists and urologists/gynaecologists) could help prevent unnecessary biopsies and improve correlation between clinical and histological diagnosis.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
0926-9959
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
20
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
905-10
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Anus Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Balanitis,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Biopsy,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Genital Diseases, Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Genital Diseases, Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Genitalia,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Patient Care Team,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:16922935-Skin Diseases
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The usefulness of a diagnostic biopsy clinic in a genitourinary medicine setting: recent experience and a review of the literature.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Jefferiss Wing, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK. drioulios@hotmail.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Review
|