Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16683206
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-5-9
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The response of a neuron in the visual cortex to stimuli of different contrast placed in its receptive field is commonly characterized using the contrast response curve. When attention is directed into the receptive field of a V4 neuron, its contrast response curve is shifted to lower contrast values (Reynolds et al., 2000). The neuron will thus be able to respond to weaker stimuli than it responded to without attention. Attention also increases the coherence between neurons responding to the same stimulus (Fries et al., 2001). We studied how the firing rate and synchrony of a densely interconnected cortical network varied with contrast and how they were modulated by attention. The changes in contrast and attention were modeled as changes in driving current to the network neurons. We found that an increased driving current to the excitatory neurons increased the overall firing rate of the network, whereas variation of the driving current to inhibitory neurons modulated the synchrony of the network. We explain the synchrony modulation in terms of a locking phenomenon during which the ratio of excitatory to inhibitory firing rates is approximately constant for a range of driving current values. We explored the hypothesis that contrast is represented primarily as a drive to the excitatory neurons, whereas attention corresponds to a reduction in driving current to the inhibitory neurons. Using this hypothesis, the model reproduces the following experimental observations: (1) the firing rate of the excitatory neurons increases with contrast; (2) for high contrast stimuli, the firing rate saturates and the network synchronizes; (3) attention shifts the contrast response curve to lower contrast values; (4) attention leads to stronger synchronization that starts at a lower value of the contrast compared with the attend-away condition. In addition, it predicts that attention increases the delay between the inhibitory and excitatory synchronous volleys produced by the network, allowing the stimulus to recruit more downstream neurons.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jun
|
| pubmed:issn |
0929-5313
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
20
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
247-64
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-3
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Action Potentials,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Attention,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Cats,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Contrast Sensitivity,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Cortical Synchronization,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Models, Neurological,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Nerve Net,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Neural Inhibition,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Neural Pathways,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Neurons,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Rats,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Synaptic Transmission,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:16683206-Visual Cortex
|
| pubmed:year |
2006
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Attentional modulation of firing rate and synchrony in a model cortical network.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Computational Neurophysics Laboratory, Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3255, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. buia@physics.unc.edu
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|