Linked Life Data

16462097

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16462097

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-2-7
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to discuss subject selection and the evaluation method for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical sciences. We designed the OSCE to assess pharmaceutical students' clinical ability. In this trial, there are three stations (ST1 in circle: dispensing powdered medicine, ST2 in circle: patient reception, ST3 in circle: drug counseling), and 25 students and six instructors participated. Each student took an examination at two stations, and evaluated other students at the other station. Each instructor evaluated the student at two stations. Before the evaluation, we developed a checklist that contained the items "evaluation of the quantity" of the action, "evaluation of the quality" of the skill and the attitude, and "overall evaluation" to ensure the standardization of scoring. After the OSCE trial, we calculated and analyzed each examinee's evaluation score. In ST1 in circle and ST3 in circle, the average time for performance exceeded the time limit (5 min). There was no significant relationship between the each examinee's evaluation score and the time at all stations. The evaluation point "evaluation of the quantity" did not differ among evaluators, but a difference was seen in the "evaluation of the quality." In addition, in the quantitative evaluation, there was a difference in the evaluation of the item for which the evaluator's judgment was necessary. Instructors' evaluations were more severer than students'. In the "overall evaluation," there was no significant relation between the quantitative evaluation score and the score of the overall impression. However, there was a significant relationship with the qualitative evaluation. From these results, for assignment making, it is necessary for examinees to finish the work within the time limit, and that the evaluation not affect the performance time. Additionally, it is necessary to standardize the evaluation to reduce differences among evaluators, who should be trained. Moreover, it was suggested that the selection of an appropriate evaluation system for each evaluation item is important in OSCE stations.
pubmed:language
jpn
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0031-6903
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
126
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
83-91
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
[Subject making and evaluation method for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical practice].
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Drug Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Japan. risat@ps.toyaku.ac.jp
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract