Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-8-26
pubmed:abstractText
This study explores the relationship between the detection of psychiatric illness during general practice consultations and patient satisfaction. Psychiatric illness was defined as a score of greater than or equal to 3 on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The hypothesis was that patient satisfaction would be higher after consultations during which psychiatric illness was correctly identified by the GP than after those during which it was 'missed'. Two hundred and twenty two patients attending seven doctors at one inner London practice participated. One hundred and ten patients (50%) scored greater than or equal to 3 on the GHQ-12. The GPs classified 76 of these 110 patients as having a psychiatric component to their illness and 34 as having an entirely physical illness. Only one significant difference in satisfaction was found between these two groups--patients in whom psychiatric illness was correctly identified reported more benefit from the consultation than patients in whom psychiatric illness was present but 'missed'. Possible explanations for the largely negative findings are discussed including the difficulties of measuring patient satisfaction and the distinction between detection and management of psychiatric illness in general practice.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0263-2136
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
9
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
76-81
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Patient satisfaction and the detection of psychiatric morbidity in general practice.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of General Practice, United Medical School, London, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article