Linked Life Data

16156453

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16156453

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-9-13
pubmed:abstractText
Statistically significant differences between treatments (i.e., results typically associated with p < 0.05) may not always correspond to important differences upon which to base orthopedic practice. If the hypothesis that p < 0.05 unduly influences the perception of importance of study results were true, we would expect that presenting such a p-value would lead to 1) greater agreement among clinicians about the importance of a study result, and 2) greater perceived importance of a study result, when compared with presenting the same results omitting the p-value.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
1745-3674
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
76
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
291-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-12-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. bhandari@sympatico.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't