16143661

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16143661

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0005823, umls-concept:C0010068, umls-concept:C0079240, umls-concept:C0242568, umls-concept:C0282411, umls-concept:C0684321
pubmed:issue	6
pubmed:dateCreated	2005-12-12
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16143661-16051613
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/7802871
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Dec
pubmed:issn	0300-5771
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:EmbersonJonathan RJR, pubmed-author:MorrisRichard WRW
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	34
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	1368-9
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:16143661-Bias (Epidemiology), pubmed-meshheading:16143661-Blood Pressure, pubmed-meshheading:16143661-Coronary Disease, pubmed-meshheading:16143661-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:16143661-Regression Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:16143661-Risk Factors
pubmed:year	2005
pubmed:articleTitle	Commentary: over-correction for regression dilution bias? Not for blood pressure vs coronary heart disease.
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK. r.morris@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comment