Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16042169
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-7-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To compare the PCR and isoenzyme methods in identification of Anopheles minimus A and C.
|
pubmed:language |
chi
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
1000-7423
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
30
|
pubmed:volume |
23
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
78-81
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Comparison of PCR and isoenzyme analysis in identification of Anopheles minimus A and C].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO Collaborating Center for Malaria, Schistosomiasis, Shanghai 200025, China.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
English Abstract
|