Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16022009rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043250lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038925lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030797lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2004459lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026538lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0547047lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1524063lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:dateCreated2005-7-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:abstractTextWe hypothesized that the use of muscle flaps, known as tissue transfer (TT), at the time of abdominoperineal resection (APR) reduces perineal wound complications. A restrospective review of patients undergoing an APR at the University of Washington (1984-2003) was conducted. Perineal wound complications and eventual wound healing were compared in patients with and without TT. Ninety-two patients (mean age, 56.6 years) underwent APR; 23.9 per cent (n = 22) had concurrent TT. Patients undergoing TT were more likely to have cancer (91% vs. 77%, P = 0.05) and radiation therapy (86% vs. 52%, P < 0.01). Operative times were nearly 2 hours longer in patients having TT (7.4 hours +/- 2.5 hours vs. 5.6 hours +/- 1.8 hours, P = 0.03), but lengths of stay were similar (13 +/- 5.9 days vs. 12 +/- 7.6 days, P = 0.5). Patients undergoing TT had a higher rate of all wound-healing complications (59% vs. 40%, P = 0.1) and major wound-healing complications (32% vs. 26%, P = 0.6). However, these differences were not statistically significant. No differences in major complications were identified in patients with and without preoperative radiation therapy (26% vs. 28%, P = 0.8). Fifteen per cent (n = 14) of all patients failed to heal wounds at 6 months, but only 9 per cent (n = 2) of patients undergoing TT failed to heal their wounds at 6 months compared with 17 per cent (n = 12) in the non-TT group (P = 0.3). After controlling for important covariates, patients undergoing TT during an APR did not have a significantly lower rate of wound complications. The impact of TT on wound healing in patients with recurrent cancer and preoperative radiation therapy is suggestive of a benefit but requires prospective investigation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:issn0003-1348lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ColeJanaJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SinananMikaMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IsikF FrankFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KapoorVishalVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FlumDavidDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:volume71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:pagination117-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16022009...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:articleTitleDoes the use of a flap during abdominoperineal resection decrease pelvic wound morbidity?lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:affiliationDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6410, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16022009pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16022009lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16022009lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16022009lld:pubmed