Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-6-30
pubmed:abstractText
This study evaluated the two-year clinical performance of two types of giomers (Beautifil, a surface reaction giomer and Reactmer, a full-reaction giomer), in occlusal (Class I) and cervical (Class V) cavities using the USPHS criteria. Forty-two cervical erosion and carious lesions were restored using Beautifil and Reactmer following manufacturer's instructions. Twenty occlusal cavities were restored with Beautifil. Fifteen patients (mean age 35, ranging in age from 20 to 50 years) participated in the study. The success rate for cervical Beautifil restorations after two years was 80%, while the success rate for cervical Reactmer restorations was 71%. Occlusal Beautifil restorations had a 100% success rate.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0361-7734
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
282-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-8-27
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations.
pubmed:affiliation
University of the Philippines College of Dentistry, Manila, Phillippines. m_sunico@yahoo.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial