Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15800269rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677582lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15800269lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15800269lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185125lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15800269lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15800269lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707689lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15800269lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280519lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:issue8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:dateCreated2005-3-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:abstractTextThis analysis examined how unmeasured confounding affects estimates of the effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Data were analyzed from a prospective cohort study of 1,122 female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients in Alabama (1992-1995), wherein participants were evaluated for sexually transmitted infections at six 1-month intervals. Associations between condom use and incident gonorrhea and chlamydia infection were compared between case-crossover and cohort analyses. In a case-crossover analysis of 228 follow-up visits ending in gonorrhea/chlamydia ("case intervals") and 743 self-matched follow-up visits not ending in gonorrhea/chlamydia ("noncase intervals") (183 women), consistent condom use without breakage or slippage was associated with significantly reduced risk of infection relative to nonuse (adjusted risk odds ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.26, 0.92). Conversely, a cohort analysis of 245 case intervals and 3,896 noncase intervals (919 women) revealed no significant reduction in infection risk from consistent use of condoms (adjusted risk odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.53, 1.17). Dose-response relations between the number of unprotected sex acts and infection were stronger in the case-crossover analysis (p for trend = 0.009) than in the cohort analysis (p for trend = 0.18). These findings suggest that epidemiologic studies confounded by unmeasured differences between condom users and nonusers underestimate condom effectiveness against these infections. The case-crossover method provides an additional technique for reducing unmeasured confounding in studies of condom effectiveness.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:issn0002-9262lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HookEdward...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ArtzLynnLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MacalusoMauri...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrillIleneIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NewmanDaniel...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WarnerLeeLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AustinHarland...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FleenorMichae...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KleinbaumDavi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:volume161lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:pagination765-73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15800269...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:articleTitleApplication of the case-crossover design to reduce unmeasured confounding in studies of condom effectiveness.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:affiliationNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. dlw7@cdc.govlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15800269pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15800269lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15800269lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15800269lld:pubmed