Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15800269
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-3-31
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This analysis examined how unmeasured confounding affects estimates of the effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Data were analyzed from a prospective cohort study of 1,122 female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients in Alabama (1992-1995), wherein participants were evaluated for sexually transmitted infections at six 1-month intervals. Associations between condom use and incident gonorrhea and chlamydia infection were compared between case-crossover and cohort analyses. In a case-crossover analysis of 228 follow-up visits ending in gonorrhea/chlamydia ("case intervals") and 743 self-matched follow-up visits not ending in gonorrhea/chlamydia ("noncase intervals") (183 women), consistent condom use without breakage or slippage was associated with significantly reduced risk of infection relative to nonuse (adjusted risk odds ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.26, 0.92). Conversely, a cohort analysis of 245 case intervals and 3,896 noncase intervals (919 women) revealed no significant reduction in infection risk from consistent use of condoms (adjusted risk odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.53, 1.17). Dose-response relations between the number of unprotected sex acts and infection were stronger in the case-crossover analysis (p for trend = 0.009) than in the cohort analysis (p for trend = 0.18). These findings suggest that epidemiologic studies confounded by unmeasured differences between condom users and nonusers underestimate condom effectiveness against these infections. The case-crossover method provides an additional technique for reducing unmeasured confounding in studies of condom effectiveness.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
0002-9262
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
pubmed:volume |
161
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
765-73
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Alabama,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Chlamydia Infections,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Cohort Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Condoms,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Confounding Factors (Epidemiology),
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Cross-Over Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Gonorrhea,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial,
pubmed-meshheading:15800269-Time Factors
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Application of the case-crossover design to reduce unmeasured confounding in studies of condom effectiveness.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. dlw7@cdc.gov
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|