|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-1-25
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
A number of approaches have been used to grade levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations. The use of many different approaches detracts from one of the main reasons for having explicit approaches: to concisely characterise and communicate this information so that it can easily be understood and thereby help people make well-informed decisions. Our objective was to critically appraise six prominent systems for grading levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations as a basis for agreeing on characteristics of a common, sensible approach to grading levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-10806979,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-10915328,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-10915330,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-11157639,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-11498496,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-115569,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-1395818,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-2914516,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-3943408,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-7500513,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-7555178,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-7987764,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-8605466,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15615589-9822056
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1472-6963
|
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:AtkinsDavidD,
pubmed-author:EcclesMartinM,
pubmed-author:EdejerTessa Tan-TorresTT,
pubmed-author:FlottorpSigneS,
pubmed-author:GRADE Working Group,
pubmed-author:GuyattGordon HGH,
pubmed-author:HenryDavidD,
pubmed-author:HillSuzanneS,
pubmed-author:LiberatiAlessandroA,
pubmed-author:O'ConnellDianneD,
pubmed-author:OxmanAndrew DAD,
pubmed-author:PhillipsBobB,
pubmed-author:SchünemannHolgerH,
pubmed-author:VistGunn EGE,
pubmed-author:WilliamsJohn WJWJr
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:day |
22
|
|
pubmed:volume |
4
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
38
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-18
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Advisory Committees,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Decision Making, Organizational,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Evidence-Based Medicine,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Health Services Research,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Practice Guidelines as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Questionnaires,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-Systems Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-United States,
pubmed-meshheading:15615589-United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
|
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd. Rockville, MD 20852, USA. DAtkins@AHRQ.GOV
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|
