Linked Life Data

15274522

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15274522

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-7-27
pubmed:abstractText
The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of the validity, inter-rater reliability, and sensitivity of 36 clinically useful of Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) results for Home Care (HC) settings. The results of inter-rater reliability, criterion-related validity, and sensitivity evaluations of 36 NOC outcomes were compiled from a 10-site regional evaluation of the NOC. Findings of HC and all sites data were contrasted. More than 90% of the inter-rater reliability scores on the 36 NOC outcome label ratings were within one point, with a substantial number of absolute agreements. All but six of the criterion measures were significantly associated with the corresponding NOC outcomes, and most mean change scores were zero or positive. This was impressive evidence of the adequacy of these measures for reliable and valid use in practice.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1061-3749
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
11
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
135-55
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Assessing the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of nursing outcomes classification in home care settings.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. gkeenan@umich.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Multicenter Study, Validation Studies