Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15227794rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599840lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15227794lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347026lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15227794lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0370003lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15227794lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035946lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15227794lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0806140lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15227794lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:dateCreated2004-7-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:abstractTextSeveral methods were tested that would improve the fluorescence signal from hybridized rumen bacterial cells. Disruption of cell envelopes by lysozyme, EDTA, proteinase K and/or SDS caused only a minor increase in fluorescence signal. Use of helper unlabeled oligonucleotide probes was successful only with the Puni[H672] probe which, however, when used with specific PBBl4-labeled probe, gave fluorescence signal drop. No substantial rise in fluorescence signal was also observed with cells subjected to growth-without-cell-division treatment. Further improvements are needed to make the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)-flow cytometry combination applicable to rumen bacteria.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:issn0015-5632lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AvgustinGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LipoglavsekLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:volume49lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:pagination183-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15227794...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:articleTitleObstacles to flow cytometric analysis of rumen microbial samples.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:affiliationZootechnical Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1230 Domzale, Slovenia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15227794pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed