rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0003232,
umls-concept:C0018270,
umls-concept:C0039005,
umls-concept:C0039795,
umls-concept:C0086860,
umls-concept:C0204695,
umls-concept:C0205217,
umls-concept:C0683610,
umls-concept:C1136254,
umls-concept:C1274040,
umls-concept:C1524063
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-5-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We analysed prescription patterns for medicated feedstuffs to find out whether the ban on nutritive antimicrobial growth promotion introduced in Switzerland in 1999 had caused an increase in the therapeutic use of antimicrobial agents given orally to piglets and fattening pigs.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
1053-8569
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
13
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
323-31
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Banning antimicrobial growth promoters in feedstuffs does not result in increased therapeutic use of antibiotics in medicated feed in pig farming.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Swissmedic, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, Berne, Switzerland.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|