Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-4-14
pubmed:abstractText
The validity of brain tumour segmentation is an important issue in image processing because it has a direct impact on surgical planning. We examined the segmentation accuracy based on three two-sample validation metrics against the estimated composite latent gold standard, which was derived from several experts' manual segmentations by an EM algorithm. The distribution functions of the tumour and control pixel data were parametrically assumed to be a mixture of two beta distributions with different shape parameters. We estimated the corresponding receiver operating characteristic curve, Dice similarity coefficient, and mutual information, over all possible decision thresholds. Based on each validation metric, an optimal threshold was then computed via maximization. We illustrated these methods on MR imaging data from nine brain tumour cases of three different tumour types, each consisting of a large number of pixels. The automated segmentation yielded satisfactory accuracy with varied optimal thresholds. The performances of these validation metrics were also investigated via Monte Carlo simulation. Extensions of incorporating spatial correlation structures using a Markov random field model were considered.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-10501649, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-10877289, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-11161183, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-11293691, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-11508750, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-1153755, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-11585043, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-1513208, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-18218550, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-1908934, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-2229557, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-2692111, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-3362039, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-7840100, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-8023031, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-8796672, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-8946368, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-9330425, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-9544511, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15083482-9873924
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0277-6715
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
30
pubmed:volume
23
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1259-82
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A. zou@bwh.harvard.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Validation Studies