Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15062751
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-4-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The authors compared the efficiency of two different blood cell separators (Amicus and Cobe-Spectra) in collecting peripheral blood progenitor cells for autologous or homologous transplantation. A total number of 129 procedures were performed, 36 with Spectra, 93 with Amicus. There was no difference between Spectra and Amicus efficiencies for CD34+ cell collection (46.685% vs 46.235%; p=n.s) but the platelet efficiencies were 17.31% and 12.54% respectively (p=0.04) and, if autologous and allogeneic collections were considered separately, a marked difference resulted in allogeneic platelet efficiency between 6 Spectra and 23 Amicus procedures (26.83% vs 8.68%, p=0.0004). The authors were able to demonstrate that in 70 Amicus autologous collections there was a different platelet efficiency, if peripheral count was considered: 12 procedures performed with a platelet count > 100 x 10(9)/l had a very low efficiency (6.86%), but this value increased if platelet count lowered (13.02% if between 100 and 50 x 10(9)/l, 22.63% if between 50 and 0 x 10(9)/l, 23 and 35 procedures respectively). The study is preliminary and the number of collections is little, but the overall data suggest that Spectra (AutoPBSC, V 6.0) and Amicus separators have the same efficiency for collecting CD34+ cells while Amicus procedures have a very low platelet contamination, especially with donors.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
T
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
1473-0502
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:AdornoGaspareG,
pubmed-author:AmadoriSergioS,
pubmed-author:BallatoreGiovannaG,
pubmed-author:BrunoAntonioA,
pubmed-author:Del PoetaGiovanniG,
pubmed-author:Del PropostoGianpaoloG,
pubmed-author:IsacchiGiancarloG,
pubmed-author:PalombiFrancescaF,
pubmed-author:PostorinoMassimilianoM,
pubmed-author:TendasAndreaA
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
30
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
131-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Antigens, CD34,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Antineoplastic Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Blood Component Removal,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Blood Platelets,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Cell Separation,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Hodgkin Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Multiple Myeloma,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Platelet Count,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Plateletpheresis,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Stem Cells,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Transplantation, Autologous,
pubmed-meshheading:15062751-Transplantation, Homologous
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Collection of peripheral progenitor cells: a comparison between Amicus and Cobe-Spectra blood cell separators.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Immunohematology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133 Rome, Italy. medtrasf@libero.it
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|