14664873

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14664873

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0014586, umls-concept:C0026083, umls-concept:C0031831, umls-concept:C0449851, umls-concept:C1705241, umls-concept:C1705242
pubmed:issue	12
pubmed:dateCreated	2003-12-10
pubmed:abstractText	To examine the practice of making an episiotomy and to determine any differences in practice between professional groups.
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14664873-16412006
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/100935741
pubmed:citationSubset	AIM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Dec
pubmed:issn	1470-0328
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:AdamsElisabeth JEJ, pubmed-author:AlfirevicZarkoZ, pubmed-author:FowlerGillian EGE, pubmed-author:RichmondDavid HDH, pubmed-author:TincelloDouglas GDG, pubmed-author:WilliamsAbimbolaA
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	110
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	1041-4
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Episiotomy, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Female, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Gynecology, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Midwifery, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Obstetric Labor Complications, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Pregnancy, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Professional Practice, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:14664873-Statistics, Nonparametric
pubmed:year	2003
pubmed:articleTitle	Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors.
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comparative Study