|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
11
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-11-7
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Clinical trials of therapies for sepsis have been mostly unsuccessful in impacting mortality. This may be partly due to the use of insensitive mortality end points. We explored whether modeling survival was more sensitive than traditional end points in detecting mortality differences in cohorts of patients with sepsis.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0090-3493
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
31
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
2627-33
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-APACHE,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Age Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Endpoint Determination,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Kidney Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Liver Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Models, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Risk Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Sepsis,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Survival Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:14605534-Time Factors
|
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Reassessing the value of short-term mortality in sepsis: comparing conventional approaches to modeling.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|
