Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14602810
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
31
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-11-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Many neurons in visual area V1 respond better to a pop-out stimulus, such as a single vertical bar among many horizontal bars, than to a homogeneous stimulus, such as a stimulus with all vertical bars. Many studies have suggested such cells represent neural correlates of pop-out, or more generally figure-ground segregation. However, preference for pop-out stimuli over homogeneous stimuli could also arise from a nonspecific selectivity for feature discontinuities between the target and the background, without any specificity for pop-out per se. To distinguish between these two confounding scenarios, we compared the responses of V1 neurons to pop-out stimuli with the responses to "conjunction-target" stimuli, which have more complex feature discontinuities between the target and the surround, as in a stimulus with a blue vertical bar among blue horizontal bars and yellow vertical bars. The target in conjunction-target stimuli does not pop out, which we psychophysically verified. V1 cells in general responded similarly to pop-out and conjunction-target stimuli, and only a small minority of cells (approximately 2% by one measure) distinguished the pop-out and conjunction-target stimuli from each other and from homogeneous stimuli. Nevertheless, the responses of approximately 50% of the cells were significantly modulated across all center-surround stimuli, indicating that V1 cells can convey information about the feature discontinuities between the center and the surround as part of a network of neurons, although individual cells by themselves fail to explicitly represent pop-out. In light of our results, unambiguous pop-out selectivity at the level of individual cells remains to be demonstrated in V1 or elsewhere in the visual cortex.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1529-2401
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
5
|
pubmed:volume |
23
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
9968-80
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Cluster Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Contrast Sensitivity,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Field Dependence-Independence,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Fixation, Ocular,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Form Perception,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Macaca mulatta,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Neurons,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Pattern Recognition, Visual,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Photic Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:14602810-Visual Cortex
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
How selective are V1 cells for pop-out stimuli?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. jay@salk.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|