Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-9-25
pubmed:abstractText
A study was conducted to compare the current conventional method and the impedance method for rapid detection of total counts of bacteria and fungi in bottled purified water. The results indicated that the corresponding detection rate for the 2 methods was 94.5 and 90.4%, respectively. The detection time was shortened from 48 h (bacteria) and 5 days (fungi) to 14.5 and 44 h, respectively. Moreover, for more serious contamination, less time was needed. The impedance method predicted a positive sample within 11.3 h (bacteria) and 27.1 h (fungi). Therefore, the impedance method was found to be a rapid, accurate method.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1060-3271
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
86
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
719-21
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-3-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Impedance method for rapid detection of total counts of bacteria and fungi in bottled purified water.
pubmed:affiliation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guang Dong Province, No.176 Xingang Rd West, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China 510300. jichenghuang@163.net
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article