Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-8-22
pubmed:abstractText
Breath odor is scored by different techniques, each with its own shortcomings. Organoleptic ratings are uncomfortable for the patient, subjective, influenced by external parameters including food and cosmetics, and especially lack international calibration. Portable sulphide monitors are relatively expensive and neglect several major malodorous molecules (e.g., butyric and propionic acids, putrescine, and cadaverine). Gas chromatography necessitates expensive devices and experienced technicians. This pilot study explored the applicability of a new technique (saliva incubation) by comparing its discrimination power, in a morning bad breath inhibition study of antiseptics, to those of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) measurement devices and organoleptic ratings.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Anti-Infective Agents, Local, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Cariostatic Agents, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Cetylpyridinium, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Chlorhexidine, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Fluorides, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Hydrogen Sulfide, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Mouthwashes, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Placebos, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Sulfhydryl Compounds, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Sulfides, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Toothpastes, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/dimethyl sulfide, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/methylmercaptan
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0022-3492
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
74
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
937-44
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Anti-Infective Agents, Local, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Cariostatic Agents, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Cetylpyridinium, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Chlorhexidine, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Colony Count, Microbial, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Cross-Over Studies, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Double-Blind Method, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Female, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Fluorides, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Halitosis, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Hydrogen Sulfide, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Male, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Mouthwashes, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Pilot Projects, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Placebos, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Reproducibility of Results, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Saliva, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Sulfhydryl Compounds, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Sulfides, pubmed-meshheading:12931755-Toothpastes
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
A salivary incubation test for evaluation of oral malodor: a pilot study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Marc.Quirynen@med.kuleuven.ac.be
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial