Linked Life Data

12880400

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12880400

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-7-25
pubmed:abstractText
This study reports a prospective clinical trial comparing a carbon fibre reinforced carbon (CFRC) endodontic post with a conventional prefabricated post. Twenty-seven single rooted maxillary anterior teeth in 18 patients (nine males and nine females; age range 18-60 years) were restored either with a CFRC post or a wrought precious alloy control. Cast type III gold alloy cores were used in conjunction with both post groups. The CRFC posts (n = 16) were cemented with a composite luting agent and the conventional posts (control) were cemented with zinc phosphate. Four failures were recorded in the CFRC post group at 24, 29, 56 and 87 months, compared with one failure in the control group at 84 months. These results suggest that post-retained crowns utilizing a CFRC material and a composite resin luting agent do not perform as well as conventional wrought precious alloy posts.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0305-182X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
785-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Restorative Dentistry, University of Bristol Dental School, Bristol, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial