Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-12-22
pubmed:abstractText
Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been reported to be safe and feasible. However, whether it offers any additional advantages remains controversial. This study reports a randomized trial that compared the clinical outcomes of two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1432-2218
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
17
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1624-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Diagnosis, Differential, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Equipment Design, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Feasibility Studies, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Female, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Gallbladder Diseases, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Gallbladder Neoplasms, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Gallstones, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Male, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Pain, Postoperative, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Pain Measurement, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Patient Satisfaction, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:12874694-Surgical Wound Infection
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, N. T., Hong Kong SAR, China.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial