12787377

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12787377

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0031809, umls-concept:C0086035, umls-concept:C0679739
pubmed:issue	6
pubmed:dateCreated	2003-6-5
pubmed:abstractText	This instalment in the series on professional assessment summarises how peers are used in the evaluation process and whether their judgements are reliable and valid.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/7605655
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Jun
pubmed:issn	0308-0110
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:NorciniJohn JJJ
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	37
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	539-43
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Clinical Competence, pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Education, Medical, pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Educational Measurement, pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Feedback, pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Peer Review, pubmed-meshheading:12787377-Reproducibility of Results
pubmed:year	2003
pubmed:articleTitle	Peer assessment of competence.
pubmed:affiliation	Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. jnorcini@ecfmg.org
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't