12692450

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12692450

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0023878, umls-concept:C0695347
pubmed:issue	3
pubmed:dateCreated	2003-4-14
pubmed:abstractText	A large number of related articles published within the last year were reviewed. Different types of intracorporeal lithotripter devices were compared according to their advantages, disadvantages, efficacy, safety and clinical applications. General directions of future developments are discussed.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/9200621
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	May
pubmed:issn	0963-0643
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:LeveilleeRaymond JRJ, pubmed-author:LobikLeonidL
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	13
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	249-53
pubmed:dateRevised	2005-11-16
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:12692450-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:12692450-Kidney Calculi, pubmed-meshheading:12692450-Lithotripsy, pubmed-meshheading:12692450-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:12692450-Safety, pubmed-meshheading:12692450-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year	2003
pubmed:articleTitle	Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best?
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida 33101, USA. rleveill@med.miami.edu
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Review