Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12688666
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-4-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Most cells in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of primates have a concentric center/surround receptive-field organization. Details of the relationship between center and surround often can be used to predict how cells respond to visual stimuli. Models of the receptive-field organization and center/surround relationships also are useful when comparing cell classes. In the present study, we used the difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) model to quantitatively examine and compare the receptive-field center/surround organization of koniocellular (K), magnocellular (M), and parvocellular (P) LGN cells of owl monkeys. We obtained estimates of receptive-field center size (r(c)) and center sensitivity (K(c)), and surround size (r(s)), and surround sensitivity (K(s)) from 62 K, M, and P LGN cells by fitting their spatial-frequency responses with a DOG function (Rodieck, 1965; Croner & Kaplan, 1995). The DOG function not only accounted for the responses of P and M cells, but also provided a good description of K-cell responses. We found that at matched eccentricities of less than 15 deg, K cells had the largest r(c) and r(s) among the three cell classes. K cells also had the lowest K(c) and K(s). Center and surround sizes tended to increase with retinal eccentricity for all three cell classes, but K cells showed a more variable pattern. There was an inverse relationship between sensitivity and size for both the receptive-field center and surround in all three cell classes. The surround/center volume ratio remained similar across cell classes. We conclude that K, M, and P LGN cell classes differ in the details of their receptive-field structure, but share common principles of center/surround organization.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0952-5238
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
19
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
703-11
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Afferent Pathways,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Aotus trivirgatus,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Contrast Sensitivity,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Geniculate Bodies,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Models, Neurological,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Neurons,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Normal Distribution,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Photic Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Retina,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Visual Cortex,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Visual Fields,
pubmed-meshheading:12688666-Visual Pathways
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Modeling receptive-field structure of koniocellular, magnocellular, and parvocellular LGN cells in the owl monkey (Aotus trivigatus).
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|