Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-2-26
pubmed:abstractText
The epidemiology of hepatitis A is changing, with an increasing proportion of the population becoming susceptible to infection. The burden of hepatitis A is comparable to that of other vaccine-preventable diseases for which new vaccines are available. Options for vaccination include selective programmes for high-risk groups, which could involve screening prior to vaccination, or universal programmes for infants and/or adolescents. Selective programmes have been shown to be highly cost-effective if well implemented, but there is evidence that they might be poorly implemented. If a universal vaccination programme were considered for Australia, an infant programme, with doses at 18 months and 2 years, possibly with an additional adolescent programme, would be the recommended option. Universal hepatitis A vaccination for infants and/or adolescents is of comparable cost-effectiveness compared with other preventive strategies, but needs to be considered in the context of competing vaccination options.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
1034-4810
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
39
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
83-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-9-24
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Hepatitis A vaccination options for Australia.
pubmed:affiliation
National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead and University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. RainaM@chw.edu.au
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review