Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12486712rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1257890lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12486712lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037949lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12486712lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0250604lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12486712lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12486712lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0538075lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12486712lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:dateCreated2002-12-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:abstractTextThe eotaxin group chemokines (eotaxin, eotaxin-2, and eotaxin-3) share only 35-41% sequence identity but are all agonists for the receptor CCR3. Here we present a detailed comparison between the backbone dynamics of these three chemokines. The dynamics of eotaxin-2 were determined from 15N NMR relaxation data and compared to those obtained previously for eotaxin and eotaxin-3. For all three chemokines, the majority of residues in the first two beta-strands and the alpha-helix show highly restricted motions on the subnanosecond time scale but there is dramatically higher flexibility in the N- and C-terminal regions and also substantial mobility for residues in the N-loop region and the third beta-strand. The latter two regions form a groove on the chemokine surface that is the likely binding site for the N-terminal region of the receptor. Taken together, the available data suggest a model in which conformational rearrangements of both the chemokine and the receptor are likely to occur during binding and receptor activation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:issn1097-0134lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StoneMartin...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MayerKristen...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:volume50lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:pagination184-91lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12486712...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:articleTitleBackbone dynamics of the CC-chemokine eotaxin-2 and comparison among the eotaxin group chemokines.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-0001, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12486712pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12486712lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12486712lld:pubmed