Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12 Suppl 2
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-12-10
pubmed:abstractText
This article evaluates the appropriateness of existing approaches to the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for persons with disabilities. We compare the conceptual model of HRQOL from the Medical Outcomes Study with the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. In addition, we examine the attitudes toward disease "burden" that arise from these 2 models. We note how values or the importance attached to domains of health can change with fluctuations in physical health. Further, we summarize arguments in favor of developing targeted measures of persons with disabilities. Finally, we discuss some methodologic issues in assessing physical functioning, attributions to health versus disability, and mode of administration. We conclude that users of "standard" HRQOL measures need to be aware of their limitations for assessing persons with disabilities.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0003-9993
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
83
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S4-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
Use of the SF-36 and other health-related quality of life measures to assess persons with disabilities.
pubmed:affiliation
UCLA Department of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research and Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. hays@rand.org
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.