12460223

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12460223

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0449851, umls-concept:C0814633, umls-concept:C1707496
pubmed:dateCreated	2002-12-3
pubmed:abstractText	The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the proportion of usable responses and protest votes obtained with two willingness to pay (WTP) techniques, contingent valuation (CV) and discrete choice experiment (DCE) and to assess the acceptability of the techniques to respondents.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:ArmourCarol LCL, pubmed-author:TaylorSusan JSJ
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	341-56
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:articleTitle	Acceptability of willingness to pay techniques to consumers.
pubmed:affiliation	Faculty of Pharmacy, Building A15, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. suet@pharm.usyd.edu.au