Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-10-23
pubmed:abstractText
Neglect and anosognosia are serious consequences of stroke. Authors have found great variations in their incidence and their relationship to disability has been unclear. We studied the incidence of neglect and anosognosia within the scope of a population-based stroke-incidence study, and also evaluated their impact on disability. Four tests of visuo-spatial neglect, four tests of personal neglect, and an anosognosia questionnaire were used. Sixty-two patients (23%) of the study group had visuo-spatial neglect according to our definition, 21 patients (8%) had personal neglect, and 48 (17%) showed signs of anosognosia. Using a multiple logistic regression model, we found that both neglect and anosognosia influenced disability. To ascertain the true incidence of neglect and anosognosia after stroke, it is necessary to use a community-based study design, where cases treated outside the hospital are included. Some of the variability found in previous incidence studies is likely to be explained by not using such a design.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
1650-1977
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
34
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
215-20
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and relationship to disability.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Neurology and Geriatrics, Orebro University Hospital, Sweden. peter.appelros@orebroll.se
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't