Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12199216
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2002-8-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The role of familiarity in recognition was investigated by having subjects study a list of stimuli, some of which had been presented earlier in the experiment. The number of positive responses, both to targets and distractors, increased as a result of this familiarization process. This familiarization process had a greater effect on false alarms than on hits, so that recognition accuracy was lower for familiar stimuli than for relatively novel stimuli. This pattern of results differs from that found in most experiments studying the effects of linguistic word frequency on recognition.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
1069-9384
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
6
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
309-12
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The role of familiarity in recognition.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. rlg2@po.cwru.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|