Linked Life Data

11833753

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11833753

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-2-8
pubmed:abstractText
Both standard and immune-enhancing oral formulas are widely used to forestall HIV wasting and to promote immune function. However, there is little scientific evidence to support the differential effects of these formulas in asymptomatic HIV disease. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of an immune-enhancing oral formula and a standard oral formula on nutrition and immune measures in asymptomatic HIV-infected persons. A secondary aim was to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a diverse sample of outpatients on a long-term oral formula protocol.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0148-6071
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
26
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
6-14
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of standard and immune-enhancing oral formulas in asymptomatic HIV-infected persons: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.
pubmed:affiliation
Rush University College of Nursing, Illinois, Chicago, USA. jkeithley@rushu.rush.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study