Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11552935rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1409894lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205102lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205093lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015732lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332281lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041618lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243067lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205262lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:dateCreated2001-9-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:abstractTextTroublesome faecal incontinence following a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is often attributed to faulty surgical techniques: division of excessive amount of internal sphincter or inadvertent injury to the external sphincter. The aim of the present paper was to assess the anatomic and physiological factors that may contribute to faecal incontinence following a technically satisfactory lateral internal sphincterotomy by a group of colorectal specialists.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:issn1445-1433lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OoiB SBSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TjandraJ JJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HanW RWRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThorneMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NageshAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:volume71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:pagination598-602lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11552935...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:articleTitleFaecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy is often associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects: a study using endoanal ultrasonography.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville and Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. tjandra@connexus.net.aulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11552935pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed