Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11405571
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-6-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Research on theory of mind increasingly encompasses apparently contradictory findings. In particular, in initial studies, older preschoolers consistently passed false-belief tasks-a so-called "definitive" test of mental-state understanding-whereas younger children systematically erred. More recent studies, however, have found evidence of false-belief understanding in 3-year-olds or have demonstrated conditions that improve children's performance. A meta-analysis was conducted (N = 178 separate studies) to address the empirical inconsistencies and theoretical controversies. When organized into a systematic set of factors that vary across studies, false-belief results cluster systematically with the exception of only a few outliers. A combined model that included age, country of origin, and four task factors (e.g., whether the task objects were transformed in order to deceive the protagonist or not) yielded a multiple R of .74 and an R2 of .55; thus, the model accounts for 55% of the variance in false-belief performance. Moreover, false-belief performance showed a consistent developmental pattern, even across various countries and various task manipulations: preschoolers went from below-chance performance to above-chance performance. The findings are inconsistent with early competence proposals that claim that developmental changes are due to tasks artifacts, and thus disappear in simpler, revised false-belief tasks; and are, instead, consistent with theoretical accounts that propose that understanding of belief, and, relatedly, understanding of mind, exhibit genuine conceptual change in the preschool years.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11405571-11405572,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11405571-11405573,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11405571-11405574,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11405571-11405575,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11405571-11405576
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0009-3920
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
72
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
655-84
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Child, Preschool,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Concept Formation,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Perceptual Distortion,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Personality Development,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Self Concept,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Social Perception,
pubmed-meshheading:11405571-Visual Perception
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0406, USA. hmw@umich.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.,
Meta-Analysis
|