Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-3-6
pubmed:abstractText
Recognizing and rewarding teaching faculty are increasingly important to medical schools and are often hampered by low perceived reliability and validity of measures of teaching ability. The purpose of this study was to cross-validate two independently generated measures of teaching from medical students and residents. A total of 2,318 medical student and 4,425 resident scores for single-item measures of teaching ability for 129 teaching faculty members of a department of internal medicine over a 6-year period were compared. Results showed that average teaching scores were higher for medical students than residents. Rank order of faculty were within 2 quintiles for the two groups for over 90% of faculty. Highly discordant evaluations were seen for only 8% of faculty. The authors conclude the general concordance of two independent measures of teaching ability adds evidence to the existing literature of the validity of single-item measures of teaching ability from two different types of learners.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
T
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0163-2787
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
24
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
53-60
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of resident and medical student evaluation of faculty teaching.
pubmed:affiliation
Ann Arbor VA Medical Center and University of Michigan Medical Center, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study