Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-2-22
pubmed:abstractText
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring is widely used as an index of illness severity, for outcome prediction, in research protocols and to assess intensive care unit performance and quality of care. Despite its widespread use, little is known about the reliability and validity of APACHE II scores generated in everyday clinical practice. We retrospectively re-assessed APACHE II scores from the charts of 186 randomly selected patients admitted to our medical and surgical intensive care units. These 'new' scores were compared with the original scores calculated by the attending physician. We found that most scores calculated retrospectively were lower than the original scores; 51% of our patients would have received a lower score, 26% a higher score and only 23% would have remained unchanged. Overall, the original scores changed by an average of 6.4 points. We identified various sources of error and concluded that wide variability exists in APACHE II scoring in everyday clinical practice, with the score being generally overestimated. Accurate use of the APACHE II scoring system requires adherence to strict guidelines and regular training of medical staff using the system.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0003-2409
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
56
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
47-50
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units Problems and pitfalls in the use of APACHE II and suggestions for improvement.
pubmed:affiliation
Surgical and Medical Intensive Care Units, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Validation Studies