Linked Life Data

11085860

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11085860

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-1-26
pubmed:abstractText
The principle of scientific freedom usually is taken for granted; few attempts have been made to justify it systematically. The present paper discusses three "classic" arguments, which are used to justify this principle. It will become clear (a) that each argument refers to a different understanding of science and, therefore, justifies a different type of science; (b) that each of them involves presuppositions which do not always match the social reality of scientific research; the profound changes science has undergone since its inception are not sufficiently taken into account.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1868-596X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
17
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
59-65
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-6-22
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
[Three arguments for scientific freedom].
pubmed:affiliation
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität D-Münster.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract