Linked Life Data

11042583

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11042583

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-11-20
pubmed:abstractText
To determine the impact of care on quality of life (QOL), or to detect a change in QOL over time, measures of QOL must remain stable when QOL is stable (test-retest reliability) and change when QOL changes (responsiveness). This study addresses these issues for the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL). Unlike other studies that use disease status to indicate whether QOL has remained stable or changed, in this study the patient determines QOL stability or change. The authors also sought to clarify the determinants of "good" and "bad" days for oncology patients.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0008-543X
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
89
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1854-65
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Living with cancer: "good" days and "bad" days--what produces them? Can the McGill quality of life questionnaire distinguish between them?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Oncology, McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada. mcob@musica.mcgill.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't