Linked Life Data

10662441

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10662441

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-1-24
pubmed:abstractText
Most corporations probably do not consider their in-house counsel to be potential qui tam threats. That may be a naive assumption. Case law provides an illustrative view of the legal ramifications involved when an attorney brings a qui tam suit. In general, there is no prohibition on attorneys who wish to bring these actions. Nevertheless, a corporation can take preventive steps to eliminate the likelihood of attorney qui tam actions. In addition, the corporation can take advantage of state professional ethics laws to mount a defensive action against the attorney who files any such action.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
H
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1526-2472
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
621-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2000-12-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Et Tu, Counselor: may an in-house attorney file a qui tam action against the attorney's employer?
pubmed:affiliation
Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Legal Cases