Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10623096rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010325lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10623096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086530lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10623096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086388lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10623096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521840lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:dateCreated1999-12-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:abstractTextAttorneys representing healthcare entities are not immune to federal criminal prosecution for the assistance that they give their clients. This Article focuses on potential attorney liability for aiding and abetting a client's violation of law. The author examines the securities, tax, and white-collar crime fields for guidance regarding the interpretation and application of the federal aiding and abetting statute to attorneys practicing in the health law field. Based on these analogous areas, and upon the federal criminal statutes applicable in the healthcare field, he recommends steps that can be taken to minimize the possibility of aiding and abetting liability. In addition, he recommends that the courts require a prosecutorial showing of both actual knowledge of wrong-doing and wrongful intent before imposing aider and abettor liability upon health law practitioners.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:citationSubsetHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:issn1526-2472lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchmidtM MMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:volume32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:pagination251-67lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:dateRevised2000-12-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10623096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:articleTitleNeither aider nor abettor be: attorneys become prosecutorial targets for federal healthcare crimes.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:affiliationOhio State University, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10623096pubmed:publicationTypeLegal Caseslld:pubmed