Linked Life Data

10623096

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10623096

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-12-1
pubmed:abstractText
Attorneys representing healthcare entities are not immune to federal criminal prosecution for the assistance that they give their clients. This Article focuses on potential attorney liability for aiding and abetting a client's violation of law. The author examines the securities, tax, and white-collar crime fields for guidance regarding the interpretation and application of the federal aiding and abetting statute to attorneys practicing in the health law field. Based on these analogous areas, and upon the federal criminal statutes applicable in the healthcare field, he recommends steps that can be taken to minimize the possibility of aiding and abetting liability. In addition, he recommends that the courts require a prosecutorial showing of both actual knowledge of wrong-doing and wrongful intent before imposing aider and abettor liability upon health law practitioners.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
H
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1526-2472
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
251-67
pubmed:dateRevised
2000-12-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Neither aider nor abettor be: attorneys become prosecutorial targets for federal healthcare crimes.
pubmed:affiliation
Ohio State University, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Legal Cases